Mostly Positive(74%)
unique features
visually appealing
engaging modes
runs smoothly
early access
game potential
challenge
learning curve
technical issues
derivative nature
unfinished state
performance issues
Many players express enthusiasm for the game's potential and are encouraged by its unique features and graphics. However, there is substantial criticism over technical issues, UI problems, and its derivative nature. Performance issues and unfinished elements detract from the experience, leading many to view it as promising but incomplete.
Positive Points
The game offers a promising RTS experience with unique features and potential for future improvement.Players appreciate the game's graphics and art style, finding it visually appealing.The cooperative and multiplayer modes are engaging, with diverse and varied missions.The game runs smoothly and has good optimization for an early access title.Negative Points
The game has a range of technical issues, including UI bugs, graphical glitches, and poor pathfinding.Many players find the game's elements derivative, drawing too closely from existing RTS like StarCraft and Warhammer.The unfinished state of the game is highlighted by missing features and incomplete content in campaign and other modes.Some players experience severe performance issues on high-end hardware.Mixed Points
While many find the core gameplay enjoyable, the game's early access state leads to inconsistencies in experience.The game's difficulty and learning curve are seen as both a challenge and a barrier by different players.Common Themes
The game's potential as an RTS successor to titles like StarCraft is frequently mentioned.Early access state and the need for further development are common topics.Updated 7/21/2026, 12:01:04 AM UTC