GamerTake
AI Powered Steam Review Summaries
WARNO
Action
Indie
Simulation
Strategy
Single-player
Multi-player
PvP
Online PvP
Co-op
Online Co-op
Steam Achievements
Steam Cloud
Family Sharing

Realistic, immersive, breathtaking. WARNO is the ultimate World War III battle simulator from the masters of strategy, Eugen Systems. A Cold War turns decisively hot as you command hundreds of units on a beautiful and brutal battlefield. Outsmart, outfight, and lead your forces to total victory.

Developers: Eugen Systems
Publishers: Eugen Systems
Release Date: May 23, 2024
Price (USD): $19.99
Current Players: 624

Links:  Steam Store  SteamDB

Very Positive(81%)
Cold War atmosphere
strategic depth
military realism
multiplayer experience
refined mechanics
learning curve
division system
game balance
crashes
DLC practices
developer communication
balance issues
AI problems
Overall, the reviews reflect a strong appreciation for the game's atmosphere and strategic depth, which many find engaging and challenging. However, there are significant criticisms regarding performance issues and the developer's communication and content release strategy. The mixed responses to the game's learning curve and its division-based deck system highlight both the game's appeal to dedicated strategy fans and its barriers for casual players.

Positive Points

  • The game is praised for its graphics, sound design, and overall atmosphere that effectively capture the Cold War era.
  • Players enjoy the strategic depth, with the game requiring a mix of tactical planning and real-time decision-making.
  • The game's realism, in terms of unit variety and historical accuracy, is appreciated by many players.
  • Many players find the multiplayer experience to be engaging and intense, offering a lot of replayability and challenging battles.
  • The game's mechanics are often described as a refined improvement over its predecessors, combining elements from Wargame and Steel Division.

    • Negative Points

  • Frequent crashes, black screens, and performance issues are persistently reported, with criticisms focused on the lack of timely fixes.
  • Many express frustration with the developers' communication practices, particularly regarding DLC content delays and pricing strategies.
  • Some players find the game to be unbalanced, with a perceived bias towards the Warsaw Pact factions over NATO.
  • AI-related issues, such as overly predictable behavior and lack of depth in single-player modes, receive criticism.
  • Complaints about the game's DLC practices, especially regarding unit access and perceived pay-to-win mechanics, are widespread.

    • Mixed Points

  • The game's learning curve is perceived as steep by some, which is seen positively by those who enjoy a challenge but negatively by those who prefer more accessible gameplay.
  • The division-based deck system is appreciated for its realism by some but criticized by others for being restrictive compared to what was available in previous games.
  • The single-player content, especially the Army General mode, is seen as having potential but criticized for lacking variety and depth.

    • Common Themes

  • The Cold War setting and realistic military simulation are widely noted as core strengths of the game.
  • There is a strong community feeling about the need for better communication and issue resolution from the developers.
  • Many players discuss the balance and fairness in the multiplayer mode, with diverging opinions on the division strengths.
  • The DLC and pricing model is a frequent topic of discussion, with many players feeling it detracts from the overall value.
    • Updated 10/8/2025, 12:02:35 AM UTC
    Leave feedback for this summary