Mixed(59%)
amazing graphics
fun gameplay
taming dinosaurs
exploring maps
building bases
new vs old content
costly DLCs
comparison to Evolved
poor optimization
frequent updates
pay-to-win
bugs and crashes
high hardware requirements
Overall, the sentiment towards ARK: Survival Ascended is mixed. Players enjoy the graphics and depth of gameplay, which build on the success of its predecessor with enhanced visual appeal and rich survival elements. However, the game is plagued by optimization issues and frequent, time-consuming updates, which detract significantly from the experience. There is criticism over its pay-to-win elements, as significant content is locked behind DLC purchases. The comparison to ARK: Survival Evolved shows that while some players appreciate the graphical upgrade, they feel that the game doesn't offer enough new content to justify its drawbacks.
Positive Points
The game is praised for its amazing graphics and beautiful environments, which have been significantly improved over its predecessor.Players appreciate the depth and variety in gameplay, including elements such as base building, taming dinosaurs, and exploring vast maps, which offer endless possibilities.Many users find ARK: Survival Ascended to be incredibly fun and enjoy the mix of survival and fantasy elements.The game's ability to provide a unique survival experience with moments of achievement and the thrill of taming dinosaurs is a consistent high point.Negative Points
The game suffers from severe optimization issues, making it difficult to run smoothly even on high-end computers.Frequent patches and updates are cumbersome, as they can require long download times and large amounts of disk space.Many players criticize the pay-to-win elements, where important content is locked behind paid DLCs, affecting the overall fairness of the game.Bugs and crashes are a common complaint, with many players struggling with the game's stability.Mixed Points
While some players love the addition of new features and creatures, others believe these additions don't justify the costs and are critical of the implementation of paid content.The game is often compared to its predecessor, ARK: Survival Evolved, with mixed feelings about the improvements; some see it as a significant upgrade, while others view it as a mere graphical reskin without much new content.Common Themes
Optimization and performance are major pain points, often mentioned in conjunction with hardware requirements and frequent updates.The dichotomy between the game's enjoyment and its technical issues is a common thread in the reviews.Players are divided on the new content and paid DLC model, reflecting broader criticisms of the game's monetization strategy.Despite technical problems, the core gameplay experience remains highly engaging for many fans of the survival genre.Updated 12/18/2025, 12:01:59 AM UTC