Mostly Negative(39%)
strategic gameplay
great graphics
social features
evolution system
free to play
deck building
card accessibility
monetization
economy
balance issues
pay to win
The general sentiment among players is a mixture of appreciation for the game's strategic depth and visuals and disappointment with the monetization model. While some players find the game fun despite the economy, others feel the need for spending money to remain competitive detracts from the overall experience. Concerns about game balance, particularly regarding specific classes and cards, are also noted. Despite these issues, the game retains a loyal audience who appreciate its aesthetic and strategic gameplay.
Positive Points
The game features enjoyable and strategic gameplay with a unique evolution system that adds depth.Graphics and animations are well-appreciated, providing a visually pleasing experience.The social features like the Shadowverse Park and guild system offer a sense of community and engagement.Negative Points
Monetization is heavily criticized, with many players feeling the economy is not F2P friendly and overly reliant on spending for competitive decks.There are complaints about the necessity to have multiple copies of a card before being able to dismantle them for vials, which restricts deck building freedom.Balance issues are a recurring problem, with certain classes and cards like Portalcraft and legendary cards being considered overpowered.Mixed Points
The game's monetization is seen as less favorable compared to the original Shadowverse, but not as bad as some other card games.While the game has a fun core mechanic, the value and accessibility of certain features are up for debate among players.Common Themes
There is a frequent emphasis on the game's graphics and animations, which are generally praised.Monetization and the in-game economy are major points of contention.Balancing of the game and its classes varies greatly, with some being perceived as too powerful.Updated 7/20/2025, 12:01:33 AM UTC