Mostly Positive(74%)
character customization
realistic graphics
deep mechanics
PvP and PvE
crafting and base-building
hardcore survival
combat system
detailed mechanics
community divide
server hosting
bugs and glitches
resource scarcity
cheaters
development progress
The reviews reflect a detailed and immersive survival experience that many players have invested deeply in, appreciating its realism and mechanical depth. However, these positive aspects are often outweighed by persistent bugs, gameplay balance issues, and server-related frustrations. The community is divided with some enthusiastic about its potential, while others are frustrated by its slow development and early access status. Overall, SCUM is seen as a promising but unfinished project that needs significant attention to become the standout survival title it aspires to be.
Positive Points
Detailed character customization and progression systems are praised for their depth and complexity, offering a robust simulation of survival mechanics including metabolism, nutrition, and injury systems.Graphics and environmental design receive positive remarks, with many players appreciating the realistic, expansive world filled with diverse biomes and hidden treasures.Multiplayer and community interactions are generally well-received, with many players finding excitement in both PvP and PvE dynamics.The game's realism and immersive experience, particularly with its emphasis on strategic survival and management of health and resources, are highlights for many players.The crafting and base-building mechanics are considered engaging and satisfying, providing players the ability to customize their gameplay experience.Negative Points
The game is criticized for its numerous bugs, glitches, and performance issues, which can disrupt and detract from the overall gaming experience.Many reviews point out the lack of server hosting options, forcing players to rent servers, which is seen as a barrier to enjoying the game with friends in a private setting.There are frequent complaints about the game's balance, particularly the difficulty in finding and maintaining resources like food, water, and gear.Critics also mention the presence of cheaters in multiplayer sessions, with ineffective anti-cheat measures failing to address the problem comprehensively.The slow and, at times, stagnant development progress despite its prolonged early access status frustrates players looking for a more polished game.Mixed Points
While some players appreciate the hardcore survival aspects, others find the level of difficulty and complexity overwhelming or too punishing, particularly for new players.The game's combat system receives mixed reviews; while some enjoy the realism and tactics involved, others find it clunky and unintuitive.Though the game's detailed mechanics are appealing to some, they can also be seen as a barrier due to their complexity and need for micromanagement.The player community has notable divide, with both praise and criticism for the game's evolving elements like horde mechanics and vehicle management.Common Themes
The comparison to DayZ and Rust is frequent, highlighting players' desires for SCUM to reach its potential as a superior survival experience.Survival game mechanics are both a strong attraction and a point of contention, with many valuing the depth while others lament the trial-and-error learning curve.Performance issues, such as server stability and graphical glitches, are common concerns that affect player satisfaction.There is widespread anticipation for the game's full release, with players eager for promised improvements and broader gameplay enhancements.Updated 6/18/2025, 12:01:26 AM UTC
